| 507 | 0 | 41 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
政务服务信息化作为数字政府建设的重要内容,其能否有效提升流动人口就业质量,是流动中国时代背景下的重要话题。本文以“信息惠民国家试点”政策刻画政务服务信息化,基于2011—2018年中国流动人口动态监测调查数据(CMDS),采用双重差分模型,实证检验政务服务信息化对于流动人口就业质量的影响。研究发现,政务服务信息化显著提高流动人口就业质量,该结论经过一系列稳健性检验后依然成立。其作用机制在于,政务服务信息化通过促进个体技能匹配、刺激企业用工需求两个渠道提升流动人口就业质量。此外,政策效果呈现出显著的异质性。在个体层面,低技能和流动时间长的劳动者受益更显著;在城市层面,低市场化水平地区的政策效应更为突出。本文的研究结果为信息化时代下完善流动人口的就业支持政策提供经验证据和有益启示。
Abstract：As an important part of digital government construction,whether the informationisation of government services can effectively improve the job quality of the migrant workers is an important topic.In this paper,the informationisation of government services is portrayed in the policy of " National Pilot Policy of Information Benefiting the People",and based on the data of China Migrants Dynamic Survey(CMDS) from 2011 to 2018,a DID model is used to empirically test the impact of the informationisation of government services on the job quality of the migrant workers.It is found that the informationisation of government services significantly improves the job quality of the migrant workers,and this conclusion still holds after a series of robustness tests.The mechanism of action lies in the fact that informationisation of government services enhances the job quality of the migrant workers through two channels,namely,facilitating individual skill matching and labor demand.In addition,the policy effects show significant heterogeneity.At the individual level,workers with low skills and long mobility time benefit more significantly;at the city level,the policy effect is more prominent in areas with low public service level.The findings of this paper provide empirical evidence and useful insights for improving the employment support policy for the migrant workers in the informationization era.
蔡昉.2017.中国经济改革效应分析——劳动力重新配置的视角[J].经济研究,52(7):4-17.Cai F.2017.Reform effects in China:A perspective of labor reallocation[J].Economic Research Journal, 52(7):4-17.(in Chinese)
陈曦,吴英巨,朱建华.2024.新质生产力视角下地方人才引进与全要素生产率[J].经济管理,46(12):104-120.Chen X,Wu Y J,Zhu J H.2024.Talent introduction and total factor productivity from the perspective of new quality productivity force[J].Business and Management Journal,46(12):104-120.(in Chinese)
付明辉,刘传江.2025.社会网络、数字经济与农业转移人口高质量充分就业[J].劳动经济研究,13(1):131-159.Fu M H,Liu C J.2025.Social networks, digital economy,and high-quality and full employment of migrant workers[J].Studies in Labor Economics, 13(1):131-159.(in Chinese)
郭冬梅,晏正伟,李兵.2025.文化多样性与农民工就业表现——基于方言视角的经验研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,45(2):520-538.Guo D M, Yan Z W,Li B.2025.Cultural diversity and the labor market performance of migrant workers:Empirical research from the perspective of dialect[J].Systems Engineering-Theory&Practice, 45(2):520-538.(in Chinese)
何雨可,牛耕,逯建,等.2024.数字治理与城市创业活力——来自“信息惠民国家试点”政策的证据[J].数量经济技术经济研究,41(1):47-66.He Y K,Niu G,Lu J,et al.2024.Digital governance and urban entrepreneurial vitality:Evidence from the"national pilot policy of information benefiting the people"in China[J].Journal of Quantitative&Technological Economics, 41(1):47-66.(in Chinese)
黄寿峰,赵岩.2023.政务服务信息化与基本公共服务水平[J].世界经济,46(8):32-54.Huang S F,Zhao Y.2023.Informationisation of government services and the level of basic public services[J].The Journal of World Economy,46(8):32-54.(in Chinese)
江艇.2022.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济,(5):100-120.Jiang T.2022.Mediating effects and moderating effects in causal inference[J].China Industrial Economics,(5):100-120.(in Chinese)
刘涛,王德政.2021.教育水平、工作经验与流动人口就业质量[J].人口研究,45(4):85-99.Liu T,Wang D Z.2021.Education,work experience,and job quality of migrant workers[J].Population Research, 45(4):85-99.(in Chinese)
明娟,曾湘泉.2015.工作转换与受雇农民工就业质量:影响效应及传导机制[J].经济学动态,(12):22-33.Ming J,Zeng X Q.2015.The effect of job mobility on the job quality of employed rural migrants and its transmission channel[J].Economic Perspectives,(12):22-33.(in Chinese)
戚聿东,刘翠花,丁述磊.2020.数字经济发展、就业结构优化与就业质量提升[J].经济学动态,(11):17-35.Qi Y D,Liu C H,Ding S L.2020.Digital economic development,employment structure optimization and employment quality upgrading[J].Economic Perspectives,(11):17-35.(in Chinese)
石玉堂,王晓丹.2023.企业数字化转型对劳动力就业的影响研究——基于就业规模、就业结构的双重视角[J].经济学家,(10):109-118.Shi Y T, Wang X D.2023.Research on the impact of enterprise digital transformation on labor employment—Based on the dual perspective of employment scale and employment structure[J].Economist,(10):109-118.(in Chinese)
夏怡然,陆铭.2015.城市间的“孟母三迁”——公共服务影响劳动力流向的经验研究[J].管理世界,(10):78-90.Xia Y R,Lu M.2015.City Choices:An empirical study on how public services affect labor flow[J].Journal of Management World,(10):78-90.(in Chinese)
许家伟,魏下海,姜枫.2024.公共信息服务能否提升工作满意度?[J].财经问题研究,(11):117-128.Xu J W,Wei X H,Jiang F.2024.Can public information services improve job satisfaction?[J].Research on Financial and Econom ic Issues,(11):117-128.(in Chinese)
余玲铮,魏下海,孙中伟,等.2021.工业机器人、工作任务与非常规能力溢价——来自制造业“企业—工人”匹配调查的证据[J].管理世界,37(1):47-59.Yu L Z, Wei X H,Sun Z W, et al.2021.Industrial robots,job tasks and non-routine capability premium:Evidence from"Enterprise-worker"matching data in manufacturing industry[J].Journal of Management World,37(1):47-59.(in Chinese)
于文超,刘丽,陈刚.2023.政府信息公开对企业家活动配置的影响研究[J].经济评论,(6):40-57.Yu W C, Liu L,Chen G.2023.The effect of government information disclosure on the allocation of entrepreneurs'activities[J].Economic Review,(6):40-57.(in Chinese)
赵斌,汪克亮,刘家民.2024.政府数字化治理与企业新质生产力——基于信息惠民国家试点政策的证据[J].电子政务,(9):38-49.Zhao B,Wang K L,Liu J M.2024.Government digital governance and enterprises'new quality productivity:Evidence from the national pilot program for information benefiting the people[J].E-Government,(9):38-49.(in Chinese)
赵星.2022.新型数字基础设施的技术创新效应研究[J].统计研究,39(4):80-92.Zhao X.2022.Research on the technology innovation effect of new digital infrastructure[J].Statistical Research,39(4):80-92.(in Chinese)
周闯,郑旭刚,许文立.2024.县域新型城镇化建设与农业转移人口就业质量[J].世界经济,47(4):212-240.Zhou C,Zheng X G,Xu W L.2024.County-level new urbanization and employment quality of rural migrants[J].The Journal of World Economy, 47(4):212-240.(in Chinese)
Anderson J E,van Wincoop E.2003.Gravity with gravitas:A solution to the border puzzle[J].The American Economic Review,93(1):170-192.
Bonnet F,Figueiredo J B,Standing G.2003.A family of decent work indexes[J].International Labour Review,142(2):213-238.
Borjas G J.2015.Immigration and Globalization:A review essay[J].Journal of Economic Literature,53(4):961-974.
Burdett K.1978.A theory of employee job search and quit rates[J].The American Economic Review,68(1):212-220.
Coase R H.1937.The nature of the firm[J].Economica,4(16):386-405.
Jensen M C,Meckling W H.1976.Theory of the firm:Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4):305-360.
Morgeson F V,Vanamburg D,Mithas S.2011.Misplaced trust?Exploring the structure of the E-government-citizen trust relationship[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,21(2):257-283.
(1)光明学术,《当前我国人口流动新特征新趋势》,https://www.gmw.cn/xueshu/2023-11/27/content_36991894.htm。
(1)人民网,《让流动的劳动者更有保障(民生观)》,http://society.people.com.cn/n1/2025/0108/c1008-40397276.html。
(1)国家发展和改革委员会,《关于同意深圳市等80个城市建设信息惠民国家试点城市的通知(发改高技[2014]1274号)》,https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/201406/t20140623_964160.html。
(2)就业单位这一指标反映劳动者工作稳定性。根据既有文献的界定标准,国有部门包括机关、事业单位、国有及国有控股企业;外资企业包括港澳台独资企业、外商独资和中外合资企业;股份制企业包括集体企业以及股份、联营企业;私营企业包括个体工商户、私营企业和社团民办组织。
(3)垄断行业包括采矿业,电煤水热生产供应业,交通运输、仓储和邮政业,金融业,水利、环境和公共设施管理业,公共管理和社会组织。其他行业则为非垄断行业。
(4)KMO检验的值为0.596,Bartlett球型检验的P值为0.000,拒绝独立变量假设,支持主成分分析法的统计合理性。
(1)限于篇幅原因,描述性统计结果未在正文展示,留存备索。
(1)本文采用周工作时间来衡量工作强度,由于该指标在2014、2017年调查中未进行采集,回归样本量略有减少,其中流动人口平均周工作时间约为57小时,远高于法定的周工作时间。
基本信息:
中图分类号:F249.2;D63;F49
引用信息:
[1]魏下海,张彤,曾晨语.政务服务信息化与流动人口就业质量——来自“信息惠民国家试点”政策的经验证据[J].经济学报().
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“机器人兴起与劳动力市场结构性变迁的事实、机制与政策含义”（项目号：25FJLB046）的资助
2026-04-11
2026-04-11
2026-04-11