产业结构调整中的有为地方政府Local Facilitating Government in Industrial Structural Adjustment
鞠建东,刘政文
摘要(Abstract)：
本文首先根据参与个体的层级关系不同,将社会组织形式分为平行交易与垂直管理两类。平行交易中交易双方的地位是平等的,而垂直管理中有上下级的区别,上级对下级有支配权限。自由市场是平行交易,而企业内或政府的行为则是一种垂直管理。现实世界中平行交易与垂直管理两种形式往往层层嵌套、不可简单分割。接下来,我们分析了产业结构调整中可能存在的市场失灵,证明地方政府可以通过恰当的动态产业政策改善社会福利。因此,在产业结构调整时,市场的平行交易行为和产业政策中地方政府的垂直管理行为共存。第三,我们分析了资源在市场与地方政府之间的最优配置,并给出了有为地方政府的定义和条件。
关键词(KeyWords)： 社会组织形式;市场失灵;产业政策;产业结构调整;有为地方政府
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 鞠建东,刘政文
DOI: 10.16513/j.cnki.cje.20170829.001
参考文献(References)：
- 林毅夫.2016-11-07.论有为政府和有限政府---答田国强教授[N].第一财经日报.
- 张维迎.2016.为什么产业政策注定会失败?[J].中国连锁,(11):84-86.
- 周黎安.2007.中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J].经济研究,(7):36-50.
- Baldwin R E.1969.The case against infant industry protection[J].Journal of Political Economy,(77):295-305.
- Bardhan P.1971.On optimum subsidy to a learning industry:An aspect of the theory of infant-industry protection[J].International Economic Review,(12):54-70.
- Harrison A,Rodriguez-Clare A.2009.Trade,foreign investment,and industrial policies for developing countries[Z].Rodrik D ed.Manuscript prepared for handbook of development economics.
- Herrendorf B,Rogerson R,Valentinyi A.2011.Growth and structural transformation[Z].Manuscript prepared for the handbook of economic growth.
- Lin J Y.2011.Marshall lectures[M]//Economic development and transition:Thought,strategy,and viability.London:Cambridge University Press.
- Ju J,Lin J Y,Wang Y.2015.Endowment structures,industrial dynamics,and economic growth[J].Journal of Monetary Economics,76:244-263.
- Ju J,Lin J Y,Wang Y.2009.Marshallian externality,industrial upgrading and industrial policy[R].World Bank Working Paper.
- Murphy K M,Shleifer A,Vishny R W.1989.Industrialization and Big Push[J].Journal of Political Economy,97(5):1003-1026.
- Rodrik D.1996.Coordinationfailures and government policy:A model with applications to East Asia and Eastern Europe[J].Journal of International Economics,40:1-22.
- Succar P.1987.The need for industrial policy in LDCs-A re-statement of the infant industry argument[J].International Economic Review,28(2):521-534.